Van ethische dilemma’s naar toekomstdenken: immersieve technologie als katalysator voor inclusieve besluitvorming
Technological innovations bring urgent ethical questions with them. These questions call not only for judgements about what is desirable, but also for anticipating possible futures and the values at the heart of them. A key barrier to inclusive decision-making is the lack of future consciousness and ethical capacity. Many people struggle to imagine the implications of technology. Non-users in particular experience a knowledge gap and don't feel entitled to a voice in the conversation, even though they are the ones who bear the impact of that technology. This problem is compounded by the fact that the future of a technology is often shaped by a handful of companies with business models that fuel polarisation and digital dependency, while environmental impact and social costs are externalised. This increases the risk of one-sided decision-making. The project applies ethics-by-design by actively and inclusively involving city residents in exploring the ethical dilemmas raised by emerging technology. We treat social friction as a source of innovation and link technology development to values such as safety, power and inclusion. The research focuses on expanding people's capacity for imagination through two 'Moral Labs': 1 - A traditional presentation (image and text), followed by a discussion; 2 - An immersive presentation in Virtual Reality (VR), followed by a discussion. In both scenarios, multiple participants will discuss their positions and the moral dilemmas together. The VR intervention uses multiplayer functionality to create social presence. By running a moderated split test across these two scenarios, this research measures the effectiveness of an immersive experience against a traditional presentation. The richness of both conversations is analysed using Ahvenharju's (2018) five dimensions of future consciousness and the LIWC tool (Boyd, 2022). The results offer insight into how immersive technology can contribute to inclusive ethical dialogue and democratic decision-making.